CC Auto Review
A macOS app that reviews GitHub pull requests with your local Claude Code.
A macOS app that reviews GitHub pull requests with your local Claude Code.
Starting price
—
Best for
Developer Tools
Free trial
—
Explore options
See how CC Auto Review compares
CC Auto Review is a practical fit for buyers evaluating Developer Tools, Artificial Intelligence, and GitHub tools.
- Who is it for?
- Tech leads on small teams who need routine pull requests reviewed between their own reviews, because autopilot sweeps review requests every 10 minutes and hands risky PRs to a person
- Pricing
- unknown
Product information
What this product does
A macOS app that reviews GitHub pull requests with your local Claude Code. AI findings sit beside the diff, and you accept, reject or edit each one before posting. Every PR gets a 0–100 risk score, and an optional autopilot clears routine reviews while handing risky PRs to you with nothing posted. No clone and no API key to set up: it uses your existing gh and claude. Free and open source (MIT).
Sourced from karamage.github.io
Company & Maker
Who built CC Auto Review?
- Company
- karamage
- Product
- macOS app that reviews GitHub PRs w/ your local Claude Code
- Live since
- Nov 2026
The maker hasn't published a public statement we can verify yet.
See It In Action
Does CC Auto Review have a demo?
Yes — watch the walkthrough below.
Researched with AI · Data refreshed 2 hours ago · How we score
Full Report Access
Unlock the verified intelligence before you decide
CC Auto Review is a free, open source macOS app that reviews GitHub pull requests with the Claude Code you already have installed. Developers and tech leads use it to see findings beside the diff, get a 0 to 100 risk score per PR and let an optional autopilot handle routine reviews.
Who should use
Buyer-fit is derived from approved personas and use-case evidence. Search-volume noise stays labeled separately.
Best-fit workflows
- Scores a pull request from 0 to 100 for risk across seven factors such as size, sensitive areas and test gaps
- Posts reviewed findings anchored to diff lines with blocker, should, question or nit severity
- Approves pull requests with no findings on autopilot and hands those scoring above 50 to a person
- Re-checks earlier review comments and marks each one fixed, unfixed or unverified
- Runs a Security focused review profile on changes to auth or migration files
- Tech leads on small teams who need routine pull requests reviewed between their own reviews, because autopilot sweeps review requests every 10 minutes and hands risky PRs to a person
Pricing reality
Vendor stated
Free and open source under the MIT license.
Actual cost
The app costs nothing, but each review runs on your own Claude Code setup, so usage counts against that plan.
Hidden costs
2 hidden cost warnings — unlock to view
Pricing reality
Last updated Nov 2026
Starting price
--
Mindber only shows named plan cards when they come from linked pricing evidence. If the tier data is incomplete, this page falls back to the listed starting price instead of fabricating plan names or $0 tiers.
General buyer tips
Common across software subscriptions, not findings about this product.
True cost for your case
LIVE ESTIMATEEstimated spend
--Starting price has not been verified from a linked pricing source yet.
Prices change often — confirm on the vendor's site before you buy.
Compare this product in-line
Start with a suggested alternative or type another tool to jump into a side-by-side comparison.
Engagement signals (30d)
Based on 6 linked public signals.
Mindber Activity Score™
Score locked
HOW THIS TOOL SCORES
Scores compare this tool with 49 similar tools in Developer Tools. Use it to judge Innovation and Capability before you shortlist.
Innovation Index™
Is it new, different, and easy to understand?
Medium confidence (60%) - some sub-scores have thin evidence.What this means →
Functionality Score™
Does it cover the jobs buyers expect, and can it keep up?
Low confidence (30%) - some sub-scores have thin evidence.What this means →
Data sources
Traffic & search proof
Public view keeps the ratio story. Paid view unlocks exact monthly visits, full region coverage, and CPC-level keyword intelligence.
Google Trends live interest
Live Google Trends data for CC Auto Review: interest over time, regions, topics, and related queries.
Tracks 12-month Google search interest on a 0-100 relative interest scale.
Includes regional demand, so readers can see where search interest is strongest.
Includes related topics and related queries to surface adjacent demand and search intent.
FAQ
Only linked Q and A rows are shown. Empty FAQ data stays hidden.
Community & reach
Public numbers each platform shows for the product's own channels.
Sources and methodology
Only evidence with a linked source record or explicit feature provenance is shown here. Data without provenance stays off the page.
COMMUNITY CREDITS
Have you used CC Auto Review? Earn credits.
Verified contributions help the page stay honest. The wider member action set still lives in your dashboard so the public page stays focused on the two highest-signal workflows.
Write a verified review (200+ words) → earn 1 credit
Share the setup context, what worked, and what broke. Mindber rewards specific, evidence-backed reviews instead of one-line praise.
Write verified reviewSpot incorrect data? Submit a correction → earn 1 credit
Flag stale pricing, wrong traffic signals, or broken links and the editorial team will re-verify the record.
Submit correctionMaker access, comments, ratings, and verification requests remain available inyour dashboard.
Community audits
Member opinion — not a Mindber assessment
Be the first to audit CC Auto Review
No member audits yet. Rate it from 1 to 5 and share what worked and what didn't.