Your data analyst, in every AI tool you already use

Edgee Turbo Models
Edgee Turbo Models · US-based
Run state-of-the-art open-source models (GLM 5.
Run state-of-the-art open-source models (GLM 5.
Starting price
From $0
Best for
Software Engineering
Free trial
✕ No free tier
Explore options
See how Edgee Turbo Models compares
Edgee Turbo Models is a practical fit for buyers evaluating focused AI tooling.
- Who is it for?
- AI developers who need fast open-source model inference inside Claude Code; better than running models via API for latency and cost.
- Pricing
- unknown · View pricing
- Alternatives
- Basedash MCP server, agmsg,Bob's CLI
Product information
What this product does
Run state-of-the-art open-source models (GLM 5.1, Kimi K2.7 Code, MiniMax M2.7, and more) in Claude Code at up to 4× the speed (up to 200 tok/s) for a flat $29/month. Set up in minutes, no code changes.
Sourced from edgee.ai
Works With
Platforms
- Web
- iOS
Company & Maker
Who built Edgee Turbo Models?
- Product
- Use Claude Code with Kimi K2.7 Code, MiniMax M2.7, and more
- HQ
- US
- Live since
- Jun 2026
The maker hasn't published a public statement we can verify yet.
See It In Action
Does Edgee Turbo Models have a demo?
Yes — watch the walkthrough below.
Researched with AI · Data refreshed 2 hours ago · How we score
Full Report Access
Unlock the verified intelligence before you decide
Edgee Turbo Models is a subscription service that lets developers run open-source LLMs like GLM 5.1 and Kimi K2.7 inside Claude Code at up to 200 tok/s for a flat $29/month.
Who should use
Buyer-fit is derived from approved personas and use-case evidence. Search-volume noise stays labeled separately.
Best-fit workflows
- Accelerate code generation and debugging by running open-source models directly in Claude Code.
- Prototype AI-powered features using fast inference without managing infrastructure.
- Run multiple model variants (GLM, Kimi, MiniMax) for comparison without switching tools.
- Automate repetitive coding tasks with low-latency model responses.
- AI developers who need fast open-source model inference inside Claude Code; better than running models via API for latency and cost.
- Indie devs building AI features who want predictable pricing; better than pay-per-token services like OpenAI for heavy usage.
Pricing reality
Vendor stated
$29/month flat
Actual cost
$29/month for up to 200 tok/s; no hidden overage charges confirmed
Hidden costs
2 hidden cost warnings — unlock to view
Pricing reality
Verified Jun 2026 / Vendor pricing evidence only
Starting price
From $0
Mindber only shows named plan cards when they come from linked pricing evidence. If the tier data is incomplete, this page falls back to the verified starting price instead of fabricating plan names or $0 tiers.
Free
For solo developers.
$0
- 1 developerThat's you!
- Connect all your coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, OpenCode, Cursor…)Works wether your coding agent is used with a subscription or an api usage billing model
- Token compression (Input and Output)Reduce your token usage and costs by up to 50%
- Personal dashboard: usage, cost, sessionsView your usage, cost, and coding sessions in real-time
Team
For teams who wants more with their coding agent.
$29
- $29 / developer / month
- Everything in Free, plus:
- A large pool of tokens to use with your coding agent, on any model you wantUsage limits apply, but no need to worry about running out of tokens
- Fallback ModelsKeep coding when a provider fails or rate-limits
- Reroute ModelsForced routing to specific models to save costs
- Team observability: manage developers and squads usageControl team-wide usage, coding agent access, and squad organization
- Spending cap per seatPrevent unexpected costs and get alerts when you're close to your limit
What pricing pages often hide
True cost for your case
LIVE ESTIMATEEstimated spend
$0Recurring billing is usually the real cost driver, not the first-month sticker price.
Compare this product in-line
Start with a suggested alternative or type another tool to jump into a side-by-side comparison.
Engagement signals (30d)
Based on 6 linked public signals.
Mindber Activity Score™
Score locked
HOW THIS TOOL SCORES
Scores compare this tool with 48 similar tools in Software Engineering. Use it to judge Innovation and Capability before you shortlist.
Innovation Index™
Is it new, different, and easy to understand?
Functionality Score™
Does it cover the jobs buyers expect, and can it keep up?
Low confidence (30%) - some sub-scores have thin evidence.What this means →
Data sources
Traffic & search proof
Public view keeps the ratio story. Paid view unlocks exact monthly visits, full region coverage, and CPC-level keyword intelligence.
Google Trends live interest
Live Google Trends data for Edgee Turbo Models: interest over time, regions, topics, and related queries.
Tracks 12-month Google search interest on a 0-100 relative interest scale.
Includes regional demand, so readers can see where search interest is strongest.
Includes related topics and related queries to surface adjacent demand and search intent.
FAQ
Only linked Q and A rows are shown. Empty FAQ data stays hidden.
Sources and methodology
Only evidence with a linked source record or explicit feature provenance is shown here. Data without provenance stays off the page.
COMMUNITY CREDITS
Have you used Edgee Turbo Models? Earn credits.
Verified contributions help the page stay honest. The wider member action set still lives in your dashboard so the public page stays focused on the two highest-signal workflows.
Write a verified review (200+ words) → earn 1 credit
Share the setup context, what worked, and what broke. Mindber rewards specific, evidence-backed reviews instead of one-line praise.
Write verified reviewSpot incorrect data? Submit a correction → earn 1 credit
Flag stale pricing, wrong traffic signals, or broken links and the editorial team will re-verify the record.
Submit correctionMaker access, comments, ratings, and verification requests remain available inyour dashboard.