HoundDog.ai
HoundDog.ai · US-based
One deterministic graph from your codebase.
One deterministic graph from your codebase.
Starting price
From $0
Best for
Safety
Free trial
✓ Free tier
Explore options
See how HoundDog.ai compares
HoundDog.ai is a practical fit for buyers evaluating Safety, Code assistant, and #Data security tools.
- Who is it for?
- Application security engineers who need PII leak checks on every pull request; suits teams with many repositories on GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket
- Pricing
- free · View pricing
Product information
What this product does
One deterministic graph from your codebase. Privacy Code Scanner for GDPR data mapping, RoPA evidence, PIA, and DPIA. Dataflow Context Engine for AI coding agents.
Sourced from hounddog.ai
Works With
Platforms
- Web
Company & Maker
Who built HoundDog.ai?
- Product
- One deterministic graph from your codebase. Privacy Code Scanner for GDPR data mapping, RoPA evidence, PIA, and DPIA. Dataflow Context Engine for AI coding agents.
- HQ
- US
- Live since
- Jan 2023
The maker hasn't published a public statement we can verify yet.
Researched with AI · Data refreshed 2 hours ago · How we score
Full Report Access
Unlock the verified intelligence before you decide
HoundDog.ai is a privacy code scanner that traces sensitive data such as PII, PHI and auth tokens through source code and flags leaks into logs, storage, APIs and AI prompts before code ships. Development, security and privacy compliance teams use it to catch leaks in pull requests and keep data maps current.
Who should use
Buyer-fit is derived from approved personas and use-case evidence. Search-volume noise stays labeled separately.
Best-fit workflows
- Software development companies use the Privacy Code Scanner to detect potential PII leaks in advance
- Financial institutions utilize the Privacy Code Scanner to protect the security of customers' sensitive information
- The healthcare industry adopts the Privacy Code Scanner to ensure the compliance of medical data
- Flags a pull request that writes customer email addresses into application logs
- Generates a RoPA record from the data flows found in a codebase
- Detects an LLM prompt in source code that would send PHI to an outside AI provider
Pricing reality
Vendor stated
A free local version runs on your machine; paid plans are priced per developer per year, and Cloud and On-prem Enterprise terms are not listed.
Actual cost
Costs scale with the number of developers, so large engineering groups should get a quote before rolling it out across repositories.
Hidden costs
2 hidden cost warnings — unlock to view
Pricing reality
Last updated Oct 2026
Starting price
From $0
Free tier available.
Mindber only shows named plan cards when they come from linked pricing evidence. If the tier data is incomplete, this page falls back to the listed starting price instead of fabricating plan names or $0 tiers.
Free
CLI access for on-demand scans
$0
- Automated CI configuration pushed to every connected repo
- Sensitive data leak detection across all supported languages
- Shadow AI and third-party integration discovery
- GDPR sensitive datamap with data flow visualizations and traces
- Local Markdown report with code-level evidence
General buyer tips
Common across software subscriptions, not findings about this product.
True cost for your case
LIVE ESTIMATEEstimated spend
$0Recurring billing is usually the real cost driver, not the first-month sticker price.
Prices change often — confirm on the vendor's site before you buy.
Compare this product in-line
Start with a suggested alternative or type another tool to jump into a side-by-side comparison.
Engagement signals (30d)
Based on 6 linked public signals.
Mindber Activity Score™
Score locked
HOW THIS TOOL SCORES
Scores compare this tool with similar tools similar tools in Safety. Use it to judge Innovation and Capability before you shortlist.
Innovation Index™
Is it new, different, and easy to understand?
Medium confidence (60%) - some sub-scores have thin evidence.What this means →
Functionality Score™
Does it cover the jobs buyers expect, and can it keep up?
Low confidence (30%) - some sub-scores have thin evidence.What this means →
Data sources
Traffic & search proof
Public view keeps the ratio story. Paid view unlocks exact monthly visits, full region coverage, and CPC-level keyword intelligence.
Latest traffic snapshot
Monthly visits
2.4K
Avg visit duration
00:00:26
Pages per visit
1.51
Bounce rate
34.49%
Traffic trend
Month-by-month visits from linked public traffic evidence.
Geography
Top regions
Exact monthly traffic is paid-only. Public view keeps percent share only.
Traffic sources
Source mix snapshot
Public view keeps the ratio snapshot. Minor channels stay behind the paid view.
FAQ
Only linked Q and A rows are shown. Empty FAQ data stays hidden.
Social mentions
Only linked public mention evidence is shown here.
Mentions per month
0 in the last 30 days
| Nov | 1 |
|---|---|
| Dec | 0 |
| Jan | 0 |
| Feb | 1 |
| Mar | 0 |
| Apr | 0 |
| May | 0 |
| Jun | 1 |
| Jul | 0 |
| Aug | 0 |
| Sep | 0 |
| Oct | 0 |
Showing top 3 of 6 linked mentions.
Sources and methodology
Only evidence with a linked source record or explicit feature provenance is shown here. Data without provenance stays off the page.
COMMUNITY CREDITS
Have you used HoundDog.ai? Earn credits.
Verified contributions help the page stay honest. The wider member action set still lives in your dashboard so the public page stays focused on the two highest-signal workflows.
Write a verified review (200+ words) → earn 1 credit
Share the setup context, what worked, and what broke. Mindber rewards specific, evidence-backed reviews instead of one-line praise.
Write verified reviewSpot incorrect data? Submit a correction → earn 1 credit
Flag stale pricing, wrong traffic signals, or broken links and the editorial team will re-verify the record.
Submit correctionMaker access, comments, ratings, and verification requests remain available inyour dashboard.
Community audits
Member opinion — not a Mindber assessment
Be the first to audit HoundDog.ai
No member audits yet. Rate it from 1 to 5 and share what worked and what didn't.