Team Pulse is a related product worth comparing with Jensi.
Jensi
Jensi · MY-based
AI project management for agencies.
AI project management for agencies.
Starting price
From $0
Best for
Project management
Free trial
✓ Free tier
Explore options
See how Jensi compares
Jensi is a practical fit for buyers evaluating Project management, Task automation, and Project planning tools.
- Who is it for?
- Agency project managers who need client requests captured from email and chat; better suited to conversation-driven task intake than manual board entry.
- Pricing
- freemium · View pricing
- Alternatives
- Team Pulse,Dart,ProjectNext
Product information
What this product does
AI project management for agencies. Jen turns email, Slack, Teams and meetings into task updates your team approves, with the source attached.
Sourced from ai.jensi.io
Works With
Platforms
- Web
- iOS
Company & Maker
Who built Jensi?
- Company
- Mir Tech
- Product
- AI project management for agencies. Jen turns email, Slack, Teams and meetings into task updates your team approves, with the source attached.
- HQ
- Kuala Lumpur, MY
- Founded
- 2022
- Team size
- 2-10
- Live since
- Oct 2026
- Makers
- Keith
Some facts above are based on publicly available information and may have changed.

Problem Solved
What problem does Jensi solve?
- Stop chasing project changes across email, chat, and meetings
- Capture client requests before they disappear in message threads
- Convert conversations into tasks, owners, and deadlines
- Review AI-generated updates before changing tracked work
- Keep approved project updates synchronized with Jira Cloud
- Identify blockers, deadlines, and missed requests earlier
See It In Action
Does Jensi have a demo?
Yes — watch the walkthrough below.
Researched with AI · Data refreshed 26 minutes ago · How we score
Full Report Access
Unlock the verified intelligence before you decide
Jensi is an AI-assisted project tracking tool for agencies and client delivery teams. It turns requests, decisions, and commitments from connected conversations into source-linked task suggestions that people approve before they enter the project board.
Who should use
Buyer-fit is derived from approved personas and use-case evidence. Search-volume noise stays labeled separately.
Best-fit workflows
- Project management
- Task automation
- Project planning
- Task management
- Team collaboration
- Generates task suggestions with available owners and due dates from client emails and team conversations.
Pricing reality
Vendor stated
No verified public plan prices or subscription tiers in the supplied evidence.
Actual cost
Total subscription cost, billing terms, usage allowances, and integration-specific charges cannot be established from the available information.
Hidden costs
3 hidden cost warnings — unlock to view
Pricing reality
Last updated Oct 2026
Starting price
From $0
Free tier available.
Mindber only shows named plan cards when they come from linked pricing evidence. If the tier data is incomplete, this page falls back to the listed starting price instead of fabricating plan names or $0 tiers.
Free
See what Jensi finds
$0/mo
- Slack, Teams, Gmail, Outlook, Jira
- Every suggestion links to its source
- Community support
Starter
For a small team
$20/mo
- Everything in Free
- Top up any time
- Email support
Team
For a growing team
$49/mo
- Everything in Starter
- Priority support
Business
For the whole company
$99/mo
- Everything in Team
- Best rate per credit
General buyer tips
Common across software subscriptions, not findings about this product.
True cost for your case
LIVE ESTIMATEEstimated spend
$0Recurring billing is usually the real cost driver, not the first-month sticker price.
Prices change often — confirm on the vendor's site before you buy.
Compare this product in-line
Start with a suggested alternative or type another tool to jump into a side-by-side comparison.
Engagement signals (30d)
Based on 6 linked public signals.
Mindber Activity Score™
Score locked
HOW THIS TOOL SCORES
Scores compare this tool with similar tools similar tools in Project management. Use it to judge Innovation and Capability before you shortlist.
Innovation Index™
Is it new, different, and easy to understand?
Medium confidence (60%) - some sub-scores have thin evidence.What this means →
Functionality Score™
Does it cover the jobs buyers expect, and can it keep up?
Low confidence (30%) - some sub-scores have thin evidence.What this means →
Data sources
Traffic & search proof
Public view keeps the ratio story. Paid view unlocks exact monthly visits, full region coverage, and CPC-level keyword intelligence.
Google Trends live interest
Live Google Trends data for Jensi: interest over time, regions, topics, and related queries.
Tracks 12-month Google search interest on a 0-100 relative interest scale.
Includes regional demand, so readers can see where search interest is strongest.
Includes related topics and related queries to surface adjacent demand and search intent.
FAQ
Only linked Q and A rows are shown. Empty FAQ data stays hidden.
Social mentions
Only linked public mention evidence is shown here.
Sources and methodology
Only evidence with a linked source record or explicit feature provenance is shown here. Data without provenance stays off the page.
COMMUNITY CREDITS
Have you used Jensi? Earn credits.
Verified contributions help the page stay honest. The wider member action set still lives in your dashboard so the public page stays focused on the two highest-signal workflows.
Write a verified review (200+ words) → earn 1 credit
Share the setup context, what worked, and what broke. Mindber rewards specific, evidence-backed reviews instead of one-line praise.
Write verified reviewSpot incorrect data? Submit a correction → earn 1 credit
Flag stale pricing, wrong traffic signals, or broken links and the editorial team will re-verify the record.
Submit correctionMaker access, comments, ratings, and verification requests remain available inyour dashboard.
Community audits
Member opinion — not a Mindber assessment
Be the first to audit Jensi
No member audits yet. Rate it from 1 to 5 and share what worked and what didn't.