Manus is a universal AI assistant designed to turn your ideas into action.
29.4M/mo
Compare
Match 70%
Neo by Amp
A rebuilt, remote-controllable, plugin-powered coding agent CLI for frontier AI models.
Researched with AIData refreshed 2 weeks ago6 sourcesUpdated 1 time this year
Data refreshed 2 weeks ago6 sources
A rebuilt, remote-controllable, plugin-powered coding agent CLI for frontier AI models.
Researched with AIData refreshed 2 weeks ago6 sourcesUpdated 1 time this year
Data refreshed 2 weeks ago6 sources
Starting price
--
Best for
—
Free trial
—
Explore options
See how Neo by Amp compares
Product information
What this product does
Neo is the rebuilt Amp CLI, redesigned around longer-running coding agents. It adds remote control from ampcode.com, automatic context compaction, message queuing and steering, a new Plugin API, and major performance improvements for huge threads.
Sourced from ampcode.com
Works With
Platforms
- Web
AI Models
- Claude Opus 4.7
- GPT-5.4
- GPT-5.5
Problem Solved
What problem does Neo by Amp solve?
This is for professional software developers who spend too much time manually managing context windows, handoffs, and permissions when using AI coding agents. Today, they have to watch context percentages, decide when to handoff, and extract information from threads in a panic. Neo changes that by automatically compacting threads when the context window is 90% full, summarizing the current context and starting a fresh window. For example, a developer working on a large refactor no longer has to stop mid-task to manually summarize and restart a thread—the agent handles it seamlessly.
Company & Maker
Who built Neo by Amp?
- Product
- A rebuilt, remote-controllable, plugin-powered coding agent CLI for frontier AI models.
- Live since
- May 2026
The maker hasn't published a public statement we can verify yet.
Researched with AI · Data refreshed 2 weeks ago · How we score
Neo is a rebuilt CLI for Amp that supports longer-running coding agents with remote control, context compaction, message queuing, and a Plugin API.
Who should use
Buyer-fit is derived from approved personas and use-case evidence. Search-volume noise stays labeled separately.
Best-fit workflows
- Fix all TypeScript errors in a file
- Run tests and fix failing ones
- Add a dark mode toggle to a React component
- Plan how to add real-time chat to an app
- Review an API design and suggest improvements
- Automates multi-step code refactoring with persistent agent sessions
Inferred from public dataView source →
30-60 minutes for CLI setup and plugin configurationDeveloper requiredSoloSmall teamMid-market
Pricing reality
Vendor stated
No pricing page detected; likely free or part of Amp subscription
Actual cost
Pricing unclear; may require Amp license or usage-based fees
Hidden costs
2 hidden cost warnings — unlock to view
Migration effort from 3 platforms analyzed
Pricing reality
Verified May 2026 / Vendor pricing evidence only
Starting price
--
Mindber only shows named plan cards when they come from linked pricing evidence. If the tier data is incomplete, this page falls back to the verified starting price instead of fabricating plan names or $0 tiers.
What pricing pages often hide
Auto-renewal is often on by default and refunds are narrow.
Beta, Linux, or recovery edge cases often ship without SLA coverage.
Team and business tiers usually move to sales-led quoting.
One-time or lifetime offers tend to disappear at version boundaries.
True cost for your case
LIVE ESTIMATEEstimated spend
--Starting price has not been verified from a linked pricing source yet.
Compare this product in-line
Start with a suggested alternative or type another tool to jump into a side-by-side comparison.
RELATED PRODUCTS
Suggested from linked alternativesEngagement signals (30d)
Based on 6 linked public signals.
Mindber Activity Score™
Score locked
HOW THIS TOOL SCORES
Scores compare this tool with similar tools similar tools in its category. Use it to judge Innovation and Capability before you shortlist.
Updated May 8, 2026
Innovation Index™
Is it new, different, and easy to understand?
7.1/10
Is this idea actually new?7.0/10
Does it stand out from similar tools?6.0/10
Can buyers understand it quickly?8.0/10
Functionality Score™
Does it cover the jobs buyers expect, and can it keep up?
3.8/10
Does it cover the core jobs?5.0/10
Are the main features deep enough?5.0/10
Will it fit into your stack?5.0/10
Can users trust it to stay usable?2.2/10
Low confidence (30%) - some sub-scores have thin evidence.What this means →
Data sources
Engagement: declining (10/100)
Traffic & search proof
Public view keeps the ratio story. Paid view unlocks exact monthly visits, full region coverage, and CPC-level keyword intelligence.
Google Trends live interest
Live Google Trends data for Neo by Amp: interest over time, regions, topics, and related queries.
Tracks 12-month Google search interest on a 0-100 relative interest scale.
Includes regional demand, so readers can see where search interest is strongest.
Includes related topics and related queries to surface adjacent demand and search intent.
FAQ
Only linked Q and A rows are shown. Empty FAQ data stays hidden.
Sources and methodology
Only evidence with a linked source record or explicit feature provenance is shown here. Data without provenance stays off the page.
COMMUNITY CREDITS
Have you used Neo by Amp? Earn credits.
Verified contributions help the page stay honest. The wider member action set still lives in your dashboard so the public page stays focused on the two highest-signal workflows.
Write a verified review (200+ words) → earn 1 credit
Share the setup context, what worked, and what broke. Mindber rewards specific, evidence-backed reviews instead of one-line praise.
Write verified reviewSpot incorrect data? Submit a correction → earn 1 credit
Flag stale pricing, wrong traffic signals, or broken links and the editorial team will re-verify the record.
Submit correctionMaker access, comments, ratings, and verification requests remain available inyour dashboard.
About this data: Activity signals and intelligence cards are aggregated from public sources and reviewed by editors. Scores reflect public update frequency only — not product quality, company health, or investment suitability. Data may lag by up to 7 days. Learn more