Orca
Orca is the Agent Development Environment (ADE) for shipping with coding agents.
Orca is the Agent Development Environment (ADE) for shipping with coding agents.
Starting price
--
Best for
AI Code Assistant
Free trial
✕ No free tier
Explore options
See how Orca compares
Orca is a practical fit for buyers evaluating AI Code Assistant, Website, and AI Agent tools.
- Pricing
- Contact for Pricing
Product information
What this product does
Orca is the Agent Development Environment (ADE) for shipping with coding agents. Run Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor CLI, and every other CLI agent in parallel across isolated worktrees. Get work d
Sourced from onorca.dev
Works With
Platforms
- Web
- iOS
- Mac
- Discord
AI Models
- GPT-4
- GPT-4o
- Claude
- Gemini
- Midjourney
Problem Solved
What problem does Orca solve?
Company & Maker
Who built Orca?
- Company
- Lovecast Inc.
- Product
- Orca is the Agent Development Environment (ADE) for shipping with coding agents. Run Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor CLI, and every other CLI agent in parallel across isolated worktrees. Get work d
- HQ
- San Francisco
- Live since
- Jul 2026
Some facts above are based on publicly available information and may have changed.
The maker hasn't published a public statement we can verify yet.
Researched with AI · Data refreshed 1 hour ago · How we score
Full Report Access
Unlock the verified intelligence before you decide
Orca is an open-source, cross-platform Agent Development Environment for running and orchestrating multiple AI coding CLI agents (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode) in parallel across isolated git worktrees. It is used by developers and small engineering teams who want to multi-task across branches and review AI-generated code in one workspace.
Who should use
Buyer-fit is derived from approved personas and use-case evidence. Search-volume noise stays labeled separately.
Best-fit workflows
- Fanning out a single prompt across multiple AI agents to compare and merge the best solution
- Running servers, tests, logs, and AI agents side-by-side without stashing or branch juggling
- Using a mobile companion app to monitor live agent status, check usage, and manage tasks on the go
- Runs Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, and OpenCode agents simultaneously in separate git worktrees to compare solutions on the same task.
- Reviews AI-generated diffs branch-by-branch inside an embedded Chromium browser with Design Mode feedback.
- Orchestrates multi-branch experimentation by spawning isolated worktrees per agent and merging the best output.
Pricing reality
Vendor stated
Open-source; no stated pricing tiers in public signals.
Actual cost
Free to self-host, but users bear their own LLM/agent API costs (Claude, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode) and local compute.
Hidden costs
3 hidden cost warnings — unlock to view
Pricing reality
Last updated Oct 2026
Starting price
--
Mindber only shows named plan cards when they come from linked pricing evidence. If the tier data is incomplete, this page falls back to the listed starting price instead of fabricating plan names or $0 tiers.
General buyer tips
Common across software subscriptions, not findings about this product.
True cost for your case
LIVE ESTIMATEEstimated spend
--Starting price has not been verified from a linked pricing source yet.
Prices change often — confirm on the vendor's site before you buy.
Compare this product in-line
Start with a suggested alternative or type another tool to jump into a side-by-side comparison.
Engagement signals (30d)
Based on 6 linked public signals.
Mindber Activity Score™
Score locked
HOW THIS TOOL SCORES
Scores compare this tool with similar tools similar tools in AI Code Assistant. Use it to judge Innovation and Capability before you shortlist.
Innovation Index™
Is it new, different, and easy to understand?
Functionality Score™
Does it cover the jobs buyers expect, and can it keep up?
Low confidence (30%) - some sub-scores have thin evidence.What this means →
Traffic & search proof
Public view keeps the ratio story. Paid view unlocks exact monthly visits, full region coverage, and CPC-level keyword intelligence.
Latest traffic snapshot
Monthly visits
1.0M
Avg visit duration
00:01:54
Pages per visit
2.31
Bounce rate
49.08%
Traffic trend
Month-by-month visits from linked public traffic evidence.
Geography
Top regions
Exact monthly traffic is paid-only. Public view keeps percent share only.
Traffic sources
Source mix snapshot
Public view keeps the ratio snapshot. Minor channels stay behind the paid view.
Top keywords
Brand terms stay labeled separately from intent and comparison demand.
| Keyword | Segment | Traffic | CPC |
|---|---|---|---|
| orca | Brand term | 566.17K | |
| orca ide | Brand term | 28.79K | |
| orca ade | Brand term | 27.89K | |
| orca ai | Brand term | 44.27K | |
| orca dev | Brand term | 10.64K |
FAQ
Only linked Q and A rows are shown. Empty FAQ data stays hidden.
Social mentions
Only linked public mention evidence is shown here.
Showing top 3 of 16 linked mentions.
Sources and methodology
Only evidence with a linked source record or explicit feature provenance is shown here. Data without provenance stays off the page.
COMMUNITY CREDITS
Have you used Orca? Earn credits.
Verified contributions help the page stay honest. The wider member action set still lives in your dashboard so the public page stays focused on the two highest-signal workflows.
Write a verified review (200+ words) → earn 1 credit
Share the setup context, what worked, and what broke. Mindber rewards specific, evidence-backed reviews instead of one-line praise.
Write verified reviewSpot incorrect data? Submit a correction → earn 1 credit
Flag stale pricing, wrong traffic signals, or broken links and the editorial team will re-verify the record.
Submit correctionMaker access, comments, ratings, and verification requests remain available inyour dashboard.
Community audits
Member opinion — not a Mindber assessment
Be the first to audit Orca
No member audits yet. Rate it from 1 to 5 and share what worked and what didn't.