Pushary for Teams
When an AI agent stops to ask permission, Pushary sends the question to the person running it, in their Mac’s notch or on their phone.
When an AI agent stops to ask permission, Pushary sends the question to the person running it, in their Mac’s notch or on their phone.
Starting price
—
Best for
Productivity
Free trial
—
Explore options
See how Pushary for Teams compares
Pushary for Teams is a practical fit for buyers evaluating Productivity, Developer Tools, and Artificial Intelligence tools.
- Who is it for?
- Engineering leads who need risky agent steps like pushes or migrations checked by a named person, because rules can send a repository's requests to the lead
- Pricing
- unknown
Product information
What this product does
When an AI agent stops to ask permission, Pushary sends the question to the person running it, in their Mac’s notch or on their phone. Lee’s agent asks Lee. Sam’s agent asks Sam. A rule can send a push to your infra repo to your lead instead. Answers from the phone, Mac app and dashboard are saved with a name, so when something breaks, one page shows whose agent asked and who said yes. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Agy and Hermes.
Company & Maker
Who built Pushary for Teams?
- Product
- See who said yes to your team’s AI agents
- Live since
- Nov 2026
The maker hasn't published a public statement we can verify yet.
See It In Action
Does Pushary for Teams have a demo?
Yes — watch the walkthrough below.
Researched with AI · Data refreshed 2 hours ago · How we score
Full Report Access
Unlock the verified intelligence before you decide
Pushary for Teams routes AI coding agent permission requests to the person whose agent asked, or to a lead by rule, on their Mac notch or phone. Engineering teams using Claude Code, Codex or Cursor use it to keep one record of who approved each step.
Who should use
Buyer-fit is derived from approved personas and use-case evidence. Search-volume noise stays labeled separately.
Best-fit workflows
- Routes each developer's agent permission prompts to that developer's phone or Mac notch
- Sends git push requests on an infra repository to the engineering lead
- Exports a CSV or JSON record of who approved each agent step
- Flags very fast approvals on risky steps for a second look
- Engineering leads who need risky agent steps like pushes or migrations checked by a named person, because rules can send a repository's requests to the lead
- Small dev teams running several coding agents who need each person to answer only their own agent's questions, because routing is per person by default
Pricing reality
Vendor stated
Paid monthly Team plan for a base group of five people with a 3-day free trial; extra seats are billed monthly.
Actual cost
Cost grows with each added seat, prorated on the next invoice; annual billing is not described.
Hidden costs
3 hidden cost warnings — unlock to view
Pricing reality
Last updated Nov 2026
Starting price
--
Mindber only shows named plan cards when they come from linked pricing evidence. If the tier data is incomplete, this page falls back to the listed starting price instead of fabricating plan names or $0 tiers.
General buyer tips
Common across software subscriptions, not findings about this product.
True cost for your case
LIVE ESTIMATEEstimated spend
--Starting price has not been verified from a linked pricing source yet.
Prices change often — confirm on the vendor's site before you buy.
Compare this product in-line
Start with a suggested alternative or type another tool to jump into a side-by-side comparison.
Activity signals
Insufficient data
Only 6 of 5 minimum public signals linked. Score appears once we collect 0 more independent signals.
HOW THIS TOOL SCORES
Scores compare this tool with 59 similar tools in Productivity. Use it to judge Innovation and Capability before you shortlist.
Innovation Index™
Is it new, different, and easy to understand?
Medium confidence (50%) - some sub-scores have thin evidence.What this means →
Functionality Score™
Does it cover the jobs buyers expect, and can it keep up?
Low confidence (30%) - some sub-scores have thin evidence.What this means →
Data sources
Traffic & search proof
Public view keeps the ratio story. Paid view unlocks exact monthly visits, full region coverage, and CPC-level keyword intelligence.
Google Trends live interest
Live Google Trends data for Pushary for Teams: interest over time, regions, topics, and related queries.
Tracks 12-month Google search interest on a 0-100 relative interest scale.
Includes regional demand, so readers can see where search interest is strongest.
Includes related topics and related queries to surface adjacent demand and search intent.
FAQ
Only linked Q and A rows are shown. Empty FAQ data stays hidden.
Community & reach
Public numbers each platform shows for the product's own channels.
Sources and methodology
Only evidence with a linked source record or explicit feature provenance is shown here. Data without provenance stays off the page.
COMMUNITY CREDITS
Have you used Pushary for Teams? Earn credits.
Verified contributions help the page stay honest. The wider member action set still lives in your dashboard so the public page stays focused on the two highest-signal workflows.
Write a verified review (200+ words) → earn 1 credit
Share the setup context, what worked, and what broke. Mindber rewards specific, evidence-backed reviews instead of one-line praise.
Write verified reviewSpot incorrect data? Submit a correction → earn 1 credit
Flag stale pricing, wrong traffic signals, or broken links and the editorial team will re-verify the record.
Submit correctionMaker access, comments, ratings, and verification requests remain available inyour dashboard.
Community audits
Member opinion — not a Mindber assessment
Be the first to audit Pushary for Teams
No member audits yet. Rate it from 1 to 5 and share what worked and what didn't.