Your coding agent's missing tool: image generation

whoburnedmore
Run `npx whoburnedmore` and get an instant dashboard of your AI coding usage - tokens, cost, tool usages, mcps, skill & all else across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Open code and 12 more i...
Run `npx whoburnedmore` and get an instant dashboard of your AI coding usage - tokens, cost, tool usages, mcps, skill & all else across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Open code and 12 more i...
Starting price
--
Best for
Open Source
Free trial
✕ No free tier
Explore options
See how whoburnedmore compares
whoburnedmore is a practical fit for buyers evaluating focused AI tooling.
- Who is it for?
- Developers who want to track their AI coding usage across multiple tools; better than manual logging for aggregated insights.
- Pricing
- unknown
- Alternatives
- AgentBrush,AgentPeek, agmsg
Product information
What this product does
Run `npx whoburnedmore` and get an instant dashboard of your AI coding usage - tokens, cost, tool usages, mcps, skill & all else across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Open code and 12 more in a single place. Then land on a live public leaderboard and compare it with others. Free and open source.
Sourced from whoburnedmore.com
Works With
Platforms
- Web
Company & Maker
Who built whoburnedmore?
- Product
- Spotify Wrapped for Claude, Codex & a Public leaderboard.
- Live since
- Jun 2026
The maker hasn't published a public statement we can verify yet.
See It In Action
Does whoburnedmore have a demo?
Yes — watch the walkthrough below.
Researched with AI · Data refreshed 8 hours ago · How we score
Full Report Access
Unlock the verified intelligence before you decide
A free, open-source CLI tool that aggregates AI coding usage data from multiple tools into a single dashboard and public leaderboard, aimed at developers who want to track and compare their AI coding activity.
Who should use
Buyer-fit is derived from approved personas and use-case evidence. Search-volume noise stays labeled separately.
Best-fit workflows
- Aggregates token usage and cost data from Claude Code, Cursor, and 12+ other AI coding tools.
- Generates a live public leaderboard to compare AI coding activity with other developers.
- Tracks tool usage frequency and MCP (Model Context Protocol) interactions.
- Provides a quick CLI dashboard for a snapshot of AI coding habits.
- Developers who want to track their AI coding usage across multiple tools; better than manual logging for aggregated insights.
- Indie devs and solo founders who need to monitor token costs; better than checking each tool's dashboard separately.
Pricing reality
Vendor stated
Free and open source
Actual cost
Free, no paid tiers detected
Hidden costs
1 hidden cost warnings — unlock to view
Pricing reality
Verified Jun 2026 / Vendor pricing evidence only
Starting price
--
Mindber only shows named plan cards when they come from linked pricing evidence. If the tier data is incomplete, this page falls back to the verified starting price instead of fabricating plan names or $0 tiers.
What pricing pages often hide
True cost for your case
LIVE ESTIMATEEstimated spend
--Starting price has not been verified from a linked pricing source yet.
Compare this product in-line
Start with a suggested alternative or type another tool to jump into a side-by-side comparison.
Engagement signals (30d)
Based on 6 linked public signals.
Mindber Activity Score™
Score locked
HOW THIS TOOL SCORES
Scores compare this tool with 48 similar tools in Open Source. Use it to judge Innovation and Capability before you shortlist.
Innovation Index™
Is it new, different, and easy to understand?
Functionality Score™
Does it cover the jobs buyers expect, and can it keep up?
Low confidence (30%) - some sub-scores have thin evidence.What this means →
Data sources
Traffic & search proof
Public view keeps the ratio story. Paid view unlocks exact monthly visits, full region coverage, and CPC-level keyword intelligence.
Google Trends live interest
Live Google Trends data for whoburnedmore: interest over time, regions, topics, and related queries.
Tracks 12-month Google search interest on a 0-100 relative interest scale.
Includes regional demand, so readers can see where search interest is strongest.
Includes related topics and related queries to surface adjacent demand and search intent.
FAQ
Only linked Q and A rows are shown. Empty FAQ data stays hidden.
Sources and methodology
Only evidence with a linked source record or explicit feature provenance is shown here. Data without provenance stays off the page.
COMMUNITY CREDITS
Have you used whoburnedmore? Earn credits.
Verified contributions help the page stay honest. The wider member action set still lives in your dashboard so the public page stays focused on the two highest-signal workflows.
Write a verified review (200+ words) → earn 1 credit
Share the setup context, what worked, and what broke. Mindber rewards specific, evidence-backed reviews instead of one-line praise.
Write verified reviewSpot incorrect data? Submit a correction → earn 1 credit
Flag stale pricing, wrong traffic signals, or broken links and the editorial team will re-verify the record.
Submit correctionMaker access, comments, ratings, and verification requests remain available inyour dashboard.